Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 28th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Buxton Advertiser site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

City charge jobs threat



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
26 June 2008
COMPANIES in the High Peak fear Manchester's proposed congestion charge will hit business – and jobs.
The Government has given the green light for a congestion charging scheme for drivers entering and leaving the city.

Transport Minister Ruth Kelly has backed plans for a two-ring scheme, charging up to £5 at busy times from 2013. It would cover from 7am to 9.30am and 4pm to 6.30pm during weekdays.

But Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire Chamber's chief executive, George Cowcher, said: "This will have implications for members in places such as Buxton, Whaley Bridge, New Mills and Glossop, who have customers within the M60 'outer ring' boundary of the scheme.

"The promise is that there will be improvements to public transport before the charge is introduced but for many small to medium sized enterprises in particular, cars are central to operations; they are the most convenient and often the only viable option."

The Government has provisionally made £1.5bn backing available for the scheme, contributing to a total of £2.8bn to fund transport improvements, the rest coming from councils within Greater Manchester.

Manchester is set to become the first major British city outside London to adopt large-scale congestion charging, though the move will be subject to public consultation throughout Greater Manchester and a vote later in the year by the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities (AGMA).

AGMA is promising significant improvements to bus, tram and rail services before any charge is introduced.

However, the authorities of Stockport, Trafford and Bury are no longer supporting the bid. Councillors in Bolton say they will hold a public referendum.

Mr Cowcher said: "This charge will cover a huge area and, according to opposition groups, will cost some commuters up to £1,200 per year.

"Lower paid workers and businesses already struggling to keep their heads above water will not welcome this development.

"While we welcome increased spending on transport infrastructure, there must be more equitable ways of funding it."

The full article contains 331 words and appears in Buxton Advertiser newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 June 2008 2:27 PM
  • Source: Buxton Advertiser
  • Location: Buxton
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Badgers Nadgers,

Buxton 27/06/2008 13:40:26
The one word that is conspicuous by its absence in this whole affair is "affordable". Sure they've put a few more trains on, but only the rich can afford those. The buses will just get stuck in the traffic because most people will not have a choice.

It's not just Manchester either - the area just outside the congestion area e.g. South Stockport will be jammed back up - it's hard enought to get through High Lane and Hazel Grove as it is.

As for the costs of the referendum, that's just plain silly. It's the Councils using it to prop up teir salary budgets with consultants and managers writing policy statement and project plans.

If services weren't being centralised so much there wouldn't be as much need to commute. It would also help if there were better paid jobs in Buxton!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.